top of page

When Outsiders Enter: Elon Musk, the America Party, and the Echoes of Trump’s Rise

When Elon Musk announced, on July 4th, 2025, that he was launching a new political party—the America Party—the reaction on social media was swift, sharp, and, overwhelmingly, dismissive.


On platforms like Bluesky, commentators mocked the name (“The America Party? Real bold thinking”), lampooned Musk personally (“the world’s richest Nazi”), and confidently predicted the venture would go nowhere.


If this sounds familiar, it should. Ten years ago, when Donald Trump rode down that now-famous escalator in June 2015 to announce his candidacy for U.S. president, he too was met with laughter, late-night jokes, and a torrent of dismissals from journalists, pundits, and the political establishment.


In both cases, the public ridiculing reveals something deeper: how societies struggle to take unconventional outsiders seriously—until they can no longer ignore them.


The Reaction to Musk’s Announcement

Musk’s declaration of the America Party was framed by him as a response to widespread dissatisfaction with America’s two-party system. “By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party, and you shall have it!” he posted.


Yet Bluesky and other online spaces were flooded with derision:

  • Comments mocked the name as unserious and amateurish.

  • Many declared Musk lacked the “attention span” or organizational ability to follow through.

  • Others focused on his South African birth, implying he wasn’t even eligible for real leadership.

  • And more still dismissed it as a grift, ego trip, or sideshow.

As one user summarized, “This is exactly the kind of thing Musk starts and then forgets about when the drugs wear off.”


The consensus among commentators was clear: Musk’s party was doomed to irrelevance, and the idea of him becoming a meaningful political force was a joke.


How This Mirrors Trump’s 2015 Experience

In June 2015, Donald Trump announced his presidential run in a speech many derided as unhinged and offensive, especially when he accused Mexico of sending “rapists” across the U.S. border.


The reaction then:

  • Political scientists called his candidacy “a stunt” to promote his brand.

  • Media outlets framed his campaign as entertainment.

  • Even the Republican Party establishment dismissed him as unserious.

  • Late-night hosts and comedians made him the butt of endless jokes.

Headlines used words like "clown," "vanity project," and "circus act."


And yet, within months, Trump rose to the top of the Republican primary polls. By November 2016, he had won the presidency.


Why Do We Underestimate Outsiders?

There are a few psychological and structural reasons for this recurring pattern:


  1. Status Quo Bias—People and institutions tend to assume that political power will remain within familiar channels (parties, politicians, insiders).

  2. Heuristic of Competence—Because figures like Trump or Musk break norms of political communication, they appear incompetent to traditional observers, even when their methods resonate with voters.

  3. Elite Insularity—Media and political elites often misread the mood of the broader electorate, assuming their skepticism is widely shared.

  4. Humor as Defense—Mockery is an easy way to dismiss a threat without engaging with its potential seriousness.


Key Differences Between Musk and Trump

It’s worth noting that, while the parallels are striking, there are also major differences:


Whereas Trump leveraged the infrastructure of the Republican Party to vault to power, Musk’s attempt to create an entirely new party faces steeper logistical and legal hurdles.


Why the Ridicule May Be Misguided

While it is entirely possible that Musk’s America Party fizzles—a victim of his own short attention span, voter indifference, or the formidable two-party system—it would be a mistake to dismiss it outright for several reasons:


  • Musk has a massive platform, with hundreds of millions of followers and the ability to shape narratives almost instantaneously.

  • His companies (Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, and Starlink) give him unmatched access to capital, technology, and attention.

  • His message—that the current system is corrupt, wasteful, and unrepresentative—taps into a genuine frustration shared across the political spectrum.

  • History shows that charismatic outsiders can gain traction if the timing and mood of the electorate align.


Trump’s victory in 2016, previously thought impossible, reshaped American politics overnight. The same undercurrents—distrust in elites, hunger for disruption, disdain for “business as usual”—are still present today.


Conclusion

Elon Musk’s launch of the America Party is being met with laughter, sarcasm, and scorn. But so was Donald Trump’s candidacy a decade ago.


The lesson is not that Musk will necessarily succeed—the barriers are real, and the U.S. system is resistant to third parties. The lesson is that public ridicule does not equal political irrelevance. In fact, it can often signal that an outsider has struck a nerve.


Whether Musk is serious about this endeavor remains to be seen. But if history is any guide, it would be unwise to simply laugh it off.


What do you think—is the America Party just another punchline, or could it be the start of something bigger? Share your thoughts below.

Comments


bottom of page