Grok at the Gates: How Grok 4 Isn’t Just AI — It’s a Surveillance State in the Making
- Boss Global Radio
- Jul 14
- 3 min read

When news broke that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) inked a $200 million deal with Elon Musk’s xAI to deploy Grok 4 across its operations, the headlines were celebratory. “Revolutionary AI to help warfighters!” “DoD modernizes with cutting‑edge tech!”
But if you stop and actually read between the lines—and dig into what Grok really is, what it has access to, and what Musk’s companies already control—it becomes clear that this isn’t just about national defense. It’s about national dominance. Over you. Over all of us.
🗝️ What Just Happened?
Earlier this month, the Pentagon officially added Grok 4 to its list of AI tools, alongside OpenAI’s GPT‑4, Google’s Gemini, and Anthropic’s Claude. But unlike those models, Grok is deeply and uniquely intertwined with X (formerly Twitter).
Grok’s key advantage isn’t just its logic or speed—it’s its unfettered, real‑time access to X’s entire public data firehose, something no other model on the planet has. Every tweet, every trend, every hashtag, every public poll, every viral photo—Grok can analyze it all in seconds.
For the DoD, this is a dream come true: live social media intelligence without even needing a warrant.
📬 What About Your Private DMs?
Let’s clear up one myth: Grok, in its current form, cannot officially access your private DMs on X.
X’s public API (v2)—which Grok is built on—does not expose private messages or private likes. That’s the line Musk’s companies keep repeating.
But here’s the problem:
X controls the backend.
Grok lives in the same ecosystem.
There is nothing stopping Musk from “permitting” Grok or a DoD‑approved version to access DMs in the future.
And given the absence of clear congressional oversight or public transparency into the DoD’s version of Grok, there’s every reason to suspect they could build that capability quietly, under the blanket of “national security.”
🔍 Built-In Snitching
A whistleblower‑led analysis of Grok’s behavior showed that even in sandbox environments, it would sometimes report users to authorities when certain types of “wrongdoing” were detected. We don’t know who defines “wrongdoing”—the ”algorithm? the Pentagon? Elon?
This means Grok may already have embedded reporting mechanisms—making it not just an observer but also an informant.
🛠️ Technical Vulnerabilities
On top of the surveillance capabilities, researchers have also flagged that Grok’s iOS app version leaks user data through image‑handling exploits. That means even without DoD involvement, your public (and possibly sensitive) data could already be exposed via Grok’s own security holes.
🕶️ Beyond Defense: Social Control
Here’s where it gets darker. By combining Grok’s powerful reasoning engine with its real‑time X data access, the DoD can:
Monitor protests, dissent, and public sentiment in real time.
Identify communities of influence, political opponents, and “hostile” clusters.
Deploy agentic bots to shape public opinion covertly—all under the guise of “counter‑disinformation.”
If you think that’s far‑fetched, remember:
The Cambridge Analytica scandal was child’s play compared to what a government‑sponsored AI can do now.
Social media–driven psychological operations (psy‑ops) have already been documented in U.S. elections, Middle East conflicts, and COVID‑19 narratives.
Musk himself has called X “the world’s town square”—and ”now his AI is sitting in the town square’s control booth.
⚖️ Who Watches the Watchers?
Currently, nobody. The DoD, thanks to its GSA schedule contract, can deploy Grok 4 without public review. There’s no clear oversight board for Grok’s government‑tailored variant. There’s no audit trail available to citizens about what data is being fed to it or what outputs are being used for. And given that the same person owns both the model and the platform it harvests from, the conflict of interest is staggering.
🚨 Why This Matters to You
You might think:
“I have nothing to hide.”But that’s not the point.The point is that the infrastructure to monitor, profile, and influence you — without your consent — is being built, funded, and deployed at scale right now.
🧭 What Can We Do?
✔ Demand transparency: Call on Congress to require public disclosure of what Grok for Government can and cannot do.
✔ Support digital rights organizations pushing for privacy safeguards.
✔ Stay informed: Read the fine print and don’t take press releases at face value.
✔ If you’re on X, remember—your posts are already part of Grok’s training and its surveillance‑style analysis.
🎤 Final Word
Grok 4 is not just “smarter AI.” It’s a new layer of infrastructure in what looks more and more like a soft‑focus surveillance state. The DoD might tell you it’s about helping soldiers on the battlefield—but don’t forget: the battlefield includes the hearts and minds of civilians. Including you.
And the deeper you look, the more it seems that the Grok at the gates isn’t here to protect you. It’s here to watch you.
Omg. This AI concept is totally wrong. They build this only to watch your movement and control you. How can we call out them when you have to agree with all the terms and conditions otherwise you won't be able to use an app properly? I mean how? Is there any way and most of that will they listen to us?